Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kitzer et al. v. Devitt, U. S. District Judge, 1967 — 386 U.S. 951 · caselaw · US
General
Kitzer et al. v. Devitt, U. S. District Judge
386 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 10, 1967.
No. -.
Kitzer et al. v. Devitt, U. S. District Judge.
Myer H. Gladstone for applicants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. Minn. Application for a stay of the trial of United States v. Kitzer in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, presented to Mr. Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, denied.