Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ORANGE STATE DEVELOPMENT CO., Appellant, v. Rosa SHEBEN (Otherwise Known as Rosa Sheeben) et al., Appellees, 1930 — 36 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
Tax
ORANGE STATE DEVELOPMENT CO., Appellant, v. Rosa SHEBEN (Otherwise Known as Rosa Sheeben) et al., Appellees
36 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ORANGE STATE DEVELOPMENT CO., Appellant, v. Rosa SHEBEN (Otherwise Known as Rosa Sheeben) et al., Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 30, 1930.
No. 5601.
J. S. G. Gallagher, of Miami, Fla., for appellant.
J. W. Watson, Jr., Mitchell D. Price, and Robert S. Florence, all of Miami,.Fla., Wilburn P. Hughes, U. S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla., and Raymond F. Brown, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before BRYAN and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
Rehearing denied March 7, 1930.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in the above numbered and entitled cause is affirmed.