Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary W. Lynde, Respondent and Appellant, v. Charles W. Lynde, Appellant and Respondent, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Mary W. Lynde, Respondent and Appellant, v. Charles W. Lynde, Appellant and Respondent
160 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary W. Lynde, Respondent and Appellant, v. Charles W. Lynde, Appellant and Respondent.
(Submitted October 2, 1899;
decided October 10, 1899.)
Reported below, 41 App. Div. 280.
Motion to place upon present calendar, under subdivision 10, section 791, Code of Civil Procedure, cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 16,1899, modifying and, as modified, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the plaintiff is without any means of support other than her own exertions, and that a speedy hearing of the appeals will prevent numerous litigations, and also that important constitutional questions are involved.
James Westervelt for motion.
[MAJORITY]
No one opposed.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.