Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. E. Remington & Sons, Respondent. In the Matter of the Proof of the Claim of the Oneida National Bank, Appellant, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. E. Remington & Sons, Respondent. In the Matter of the Proof of the Claim of the Oneida National Bank, Appellant
121 N.Y. 675·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur, except Eabl and O’Bbien, JJ., taking no part.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. E. Remington & Sons, Respondent. In the Matter of the Proof of the Claim of the Oneida National Bank, Appellant.
(Argued April 28, 1890 ;
decided May 9, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made Rovember 26, 1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term sustaining certain exceptions to the report of a referee,
F. G. Fi/ncke for appellant.
Thomas Richardson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Eabl and O’Bbien, JJ., taking no part.
Order affirmed.