Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland Board of Censors, 1970 — 400 U.S. 812 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland Board of Censors
400 U.S. 812·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 63.
Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland Board of Censors.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Ct. App. Md. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 397 U. S.' 984.] Motions of Adult Film ^Association of America, Inc., Motion Picture Association of America, Inc., and National Association of Theater Owners, Inc., for leave to file briefs as amici' curiae granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.