Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
August Dinger, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 542 · caselaw · US
Corporations
August Dinger, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant
182 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
August Dinger, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
(Submitted June 12, 1905;
decided October 3, 1905.)
Dinger v. City of New York, 101 App. Div. 202, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supremé Court in the second judicial department, entered January 31, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell of counsel), for appellant.
Charles Coleman Miller for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.