Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Gallagher, Respondent, v. The Grand Trunk Railway, of Canada, Appellant, 1891 — 127 N.Y. 684 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Gallagher, Respondent, v. The Grand Trunk Railway, of Canada, Appellant
127 N.Y. 684·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Gallagher, Respondent, v. The Grand Trunk Railway, of Canada, Appellant.
(Submitted June 10, 1891;
decided October 6, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made June 1, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Martin W. Cooke for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, on opinion of Bbadley, J., in Jennings v. Grand Trunk Roilway Company (ante, page 438).
All concur, Follett Ch. J in result.
Judgment affirmed.