General
Artemas H. Holmes, Appellant, v. The Northern Pacific Railway Company, Respondent
175 N.Y. 480·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Artemas H. Holmes, Appellant, v. The Northern Pacific Railway Company, Respondent.
Holmes v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 71 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
(Submitted May 7, 1903;
decided May 22, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 6, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
William B. Hornblower and Artemas H. Holmes for appellant.
Francis Lynde Stetson, William J. Curtis and Francis D. Poliak for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Paekeb, Ch. J., Geay, O’Bbien, Baetlett, Haight, Maetin and Vann, JJ.