Contracts · MBE-tested
COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA
372 U.S. 70910 L. Ed. 2d 127·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COLLINS v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 599, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave, to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.