Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Electa A. Dyke, Appellant, v. National Transit Company et al., Respondents, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 705 · caselaw · US
General
Electa A. Dyke, Appellant, v. National Transit Company et al., Respondents
158 N.Y. 705·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Electa A. Dyke, Appellant, v. National Transit Company et al., Respondents.
(Argued February 27, 1899;
decided March 7, 1899.)
Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 28, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit without a jury, and granting a new trial.
Dyke v. Nat. Transit Co., 22 App. Div. 360, appeal withdrawn.
The ground of the motion was substantially that it will be impossible to obtain a review of the facts by this court.
Charles II. Brown for motion.
Clarence A. Farnurn opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted upon payment of costs that have accrued since bringing the appeal, and ten dollars costs of opposing this motion.