Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
W. M. LEONARD, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee, 1930 — 43 F.2d 352 · caselaw · US
Tax
W. M. LEONARD, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee
43 F.2d 352·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
W. M. LEONARD, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.
No. 8663.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 1930.
T. S. Allen, of Lincoln, Neb. (H. J. Re-•quartte and O. C. Wood, both of Lincoln, Neb., on the brief), for appellant.
Barham R. Gary, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen. (G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and C. M. ■Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Joe S. Franklin, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee. .
Before STONE and VAN VALKEN-BURGH, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — DAVIS, District Judge.]
DAVIS, District Judge.
This is a petition to review a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals affirming the action of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in asserting a deficiency of income tax for the years of 1921 and 1922.
The parties stipulated that this cause be submitted on the record and briefs.filed, and the oral arguments presented in the ease of E. B. Stephenson, appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, appellee (C. C. A.) 43 F.(2d) 348.
The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with views expressed in the above-named cause, which has this day been détermined.