Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co., Inc., et al., 1939 — 308 U.S. 541 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co., Inc., et al.
308 U.S. 541·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 342.
Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co., Inc., et al.
October 16, 1939.
Mr. Louis B. Boudin for petitioner. Mr. William L. Ransom for respondents. Messrs. Isaac Lobe Straus and Claude A. Hope for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
On consideration of the suggestion of a diminution of the record and motion for a writ of certiorari in that relation, the motion for a writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is also granted.