Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francis H. Leggett et al., Respondents, v. Walter Radford, Appellant, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 726 · caselaw · US
General
Francis H. Leggett et al., Respondents, v. Walter Radford, Appellant
158 N.Y. 726·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis H. Leggett et al., Respondents, v. Walter Radford, Appellant.
(Argued March 10, 1899;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 18, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Leggett v. Radford, 3 App. Div. 619, affirmed.
John F. Brenna/n for appellant.
James M. Hunt for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.