Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; New York v. Illinois et al.; and Illinois v. Michigan et al., 1967 — 385 U.S. 996 · caselaw · US
General
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; New York v. Illinois et al.; and Illinois v. Michigan et al.
385 U.S. 996·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 9, 1967.
No. 1,
Orig.
No. 2,
Orig.
No. 3,
Orig.
No. 11,
Orig.
Wisconsin et al. v. Illinois et al.; Michigan v. Illinois et al.; New York v. Illinois et al.; and Illinois v. Michigan et al.
[MAJORITY]
Report of the Special Master received and ordered filed. The following schedule for filing of exceptions and briefs adopted:
1. Exceptions by all parties to report of the Special Master, to be filed on or before March 6, 1967.
2. Opening briefs by all parties in support of their exceptions to be filed on or before June 5, 1967.
3. Briefs by all parties in answer to opening briefs to be filed on or before September 5, 1967.
4. Reply briefs by all parties to be filed by November 6, 1967.
[For earlier actions, see 360 U. S. 712; 361 U. S. 956; 362 U. S. 908, 957, 958, 972.]