Tax
MAPLE COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
44 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MAPLE COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 8994.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Sept. 2, 1930.
Benjamin H. Saunders, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to review doeketed and dismissed without eosts to either party in this court, on motion of petitionér and consent of respondent.