Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The Tradesmen's National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, 1891 — 129 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The Tradesmen's National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent
129 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Appellant, v. The Tradesmen’s National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent.
(Argued December 1, 1891;
decided December 22, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 21, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a decision of the court on trial without a jury.
Simon Sterne for appellant.
Thomas Allison for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
. Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.