Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Company, Appellant, v. James A. Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 690 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Company, Appellant, v. James A. Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent
156 N.Y. 690·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Company, Appellant, v. James A. Roberts, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.
People ex rel. Schwa/i'zscMld Go. v. Roberts, 11 App. Div. 449, affirmed.
(Submitted June 7, 1898;
decided June 21, 1898.)
Appeal from judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 8, 1896, affirming, on certiorari, a determination of the state comptroller in assessing a corporation tax upon the relator.
Myer Nussbaum for appellant.
T. E. Hancock for respondent.
[UNANIMOUS]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on authority of People ex rel. New England Dressed Meat Company v. Roberts (155 N. Y. 408).
All concur.