Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sam Fox Publishing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 986 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sam Fox Publishing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
362 U.S. 986·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 788.
Sam Fox Publishing Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Charles A. Horsky for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks and Charles H. Weston for the United States, and Arthur H. Dean, Howard T. Milman, Herman Finkelstein, Lloyd N. Cutler and David H. Horowitz for the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, appellees.
Reported below:-F. Supp.-.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.