Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. L. Congdon, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of Michigan, 1906 — 200 U.S. 612 · caselaw · US
General
J. L. Congdon, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of Michigan
200 U.S. 612·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 117.
J. L. Congdon, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of Michigan.
Argued December 11, 1905.
Decided January 2, 1906.
Mr. Thomas J. Cavanaugh, Mr. H. T. Cook and Mr. Wm. G. Howard for plaintiff in error. Mr. David Anderson, Mr. ‘ John E. Bird, Mr. Rus sell M. Chase, Mr. Charles A. Blair and Mr. Henry E. Chase for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130.