Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benton County, Oregon, et al. v. Lafferty et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 869 · caselaw · US
General
Benton County, Oregon, et al. v. Lafferty et al.
355 U.S. 869·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 429.
Benton County, Oregon, et al. v. Lafferty et al.
Paul R. Connolly for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Roger P. Marquis and Harold S. Harrison for the Secretary of the Treasury et al., A. W. Lafferty, pro se, and James P. Kem, Byron N. Scott, Monte Appel and Donald C. Walker for Merrick et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.