Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rose SILVERMAN, Appellant, v. BERMUDA & WEST INDIES S. S. CO., Limited and Furness-Wittey Co., Limited, Respondents, 1935 — 74 F.2d 685 · caselaw · US
General
Rose SILVERMAN, Appellant, v. BERMUDA & WEST INDIES S. S. CO., Limited and Furness-Wittey Co., Limited, Respondents
74 F.2d 685·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1935
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rose SILVERMAN, Appellant, v. BERMUDA & WEST INDIES S. S. CO., Limited and Furness-Wittey Co., Limited, Respondents.
No. 184.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 15, 1935.
Silas B. Axtell, of New York City, for appellant.
Raymond Parmer, of New York City, for respondent.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The granting of a new trial in the case of Silverman v. Bermuda & West Indies S. S. Co., 74 F.(2d) 683, decided herewith, makes the appeal in this case moot.
Appeal dismissed.