Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
P. C. HESSER v. UNITED STATES, 1930 — 45 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
P. C. HESSER v. UNITED STATES
45 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1930
Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit. Tudges, and POLLOCK, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
P. C. HESSER v. UNITED STATES.
No. 94.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct. 13, 1930.
J. I. Howard, of Pawhuska, Okl., for appellant.
Roy St. Lewis, U. S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Old.
Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit. Tudges, and POLLOCK, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM. ']
PER CURIAM. '
Appeal dismissed October 13, 1930, per stipulation, at costs of appellant.