Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SPEVACK v. STRAUSS et al., 1958 โ 355 U.S. 601 ยท caselaw ยท US
General
SPEVACK v. STRAUSS et al.
355 U.S. 601ยทSupreme Court of the United Statesยท1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SPEVACK v. STRAUSS et al.
No. 641.
Decided March 3, 1958..
Carleton U. Edwards, II, Joseph Y. Houghton and Bernard Margolius- for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, E. Riley Casey and Roland A. Anderson for respondents.
Briefs of amici curiae in support of the petition for a writ of certiorari were filed by Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and Calvin H. Cobb, Jr. for the American Chemical Society, and Carlton S. Dargusch for the Engineers Joint Council.
[MAJORITY โ Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, and the orders of the Court of Appeals denying petitionerโs motion for leave to amend the complaint and petition for rehearing, are vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions (1) to allow petitionerโs proposed amendments to the complaint and (2) to determine, in light of the amended complaint, the issues raised by petitionerโs appeal.