Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Seattle Dock Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.; Cannel Coal Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al., 1904 — 195 U.S. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Seattle Dock Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.; Cannel Coal Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.
195 U.S. 624·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 390.
Seattle Dock Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.; Cannel Coal Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Seattle and Lake Washington Waterway Company et al.
and No. 391.
In error to the Supreme Court of 'the State of Washington.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 24,1904.
Decided October 31, 1904.
Mr. R. A. Ballinger, Mr. M. A. Ballinger„ Mr. J. T ot^ Mr Alfred Battle for the plaintiffs in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgments affirmed with costs.. New Orleans v. New Orleans Waterworks Company, 142 U. S. 79; Yesler v. Commissioners, 146 U. S. 646; Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1; Allen v. Forrest, 8 Washington, 700; Mississippi Valley Trust Company v. Hafins, 20 Washington, 272, and these cases, 77 Pac. Rep. 845.
Mr. Julius F. Hale and Mr. Eugene Semple for defendants in error. v