General
ANDREWS VAN LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
382 U.S. 67·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ANDREWS VAN LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 438.
Decided November 8, 1965.
J. Max Harding for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Gerald Kadish, Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.