Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary E. Carroll, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. John Conley, Jr., Appellant, 1891 — 124 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Mary E. Carroll, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. John Conley, Jr., Appellant
124 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary E. Carroll, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. John Conley, Jr., Appellant.
(Submitted January 30, 1891;
decided February 24, 1891.)
Appeal from judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 12, 1890, directing judgment in favor of plaintiff in a case submitted under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
George li. Westerfielcl for appellant.
Jolm Delahunty for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.