Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Philomena Giraldo, an Infant, by Guardian, Respondent, v. The Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Appellant, 1892 — 135 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Philomena Giraldo, an Infant, by Guardian, Respondent, v. The Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Appellant
135 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Philomena Giraldo, an Infant, by Guardian, Respondent, v. The Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 7, 1892;
decided October 25, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December J, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William K. Dykmwn for appellant.
John C. Kennedy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl, Ch. J., Peckham and Gray, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.