Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Selma G. HALPER et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al., 1930 — 45 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
General
Selma G. HALPER et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al.
45 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Selma G. HALPER et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al.
No. 9036.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Oct. 18, 1930.
Grant I. Rosermweig and Charles E. Me Coy, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appel lants.
Richard S. Kighter, of Kansas City, Mo.; for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal docketed and dismissed with prejudice, at costs of appellants, on motion of appellants.