Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 522 · caselaw · US
General
The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent
184 N.Y. 522·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.
Matter of Grand Trunk Ry. Co. of Canada v. State of New York, 97 App. Div. 634, affirmed.
(Argued January 23, 1906;
decided Febuary 6, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 15, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plain, tiff entered upon an award of the Court of Claims.
William L. Marcy for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-General (Horace McGuire of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Edwaed T. Babtlett, Webnee and Hiscook, JJ. Not sitting: Chase, J.