Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Calvaresi et al. v. United States; and Smaldone et al. v. United States, 1955 — 348 U.S. 961 · caselaw · US
General
Calvaresi et al. v. United States; and Smaldone et al. v. United States
348 U.S. 961·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 538.
No. 548.
Calvaresi et al. v. United States; and Smaldone et al. v. United States.
A. X. Erickson, W. H. Erickson and Albert E. Sherlock for petitioners in No. 538.
Peyton Ford, Alan Y. Cole and F. E. Dickerson for petitioners in No. 548.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Edward S. Szukelewicz for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
On petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
In the interests of justice and in the exercise of the supervisory powers of this Court, certiorari is granted and the cases are severally reversed and remanded to the District Court for retrial before a different judge.
Reported below: 216 F. 2d 891.