Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
George W. PRATHER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER, Appellee
5 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. PRATHER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER, Appellee.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted May 12, 1925.
Decided June 1, 1925.)
Patent Appeal. No. 1744.
J. E. Stryker, of St. Paul, Minn., and A. V. Cushman, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
J. H. Lee, of Chicago, Ill., R. F. Steward and N. J. Jewett, both of Washington, D. C., and J. Q. Rice and M. C. Massie, both of New York City, for appellee.
Before- MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORS-DEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is another of the series of interferences mentioned in appeal No. 1742, just decided, — App. D. C. —, 5 F. (2d) 1010, and for the reasons stated in that appeal the decision here is affirmed. Affirmed.