Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Salter et al. v. City of Jackson, 1963 — 374 U.S. 818 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Salter et al. v. City of Jackson
374 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 14, 1963.
No. —.
Robert L. Carter, Jack Young, R. Jess Brown, Jack Greenberg, Derrick Á. Bell, William R. Ming and Frank D. Reeves for petitioners. Thomas M. Watkins for respondent.
Salter et al. v. City of Jackson.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for stay and dissolution of an injunction issued by a state court submitted to Mr. Justice Black, and by him submitted to the full Court, and after due consideration is denied by the Court.