Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Scasserra v. Pennsylvania; Stewart v. Michigan et al.; Bosler v. Dalton, Judge, et al.; Briggs v. Louisiana State Bar Association, Committee on Bar Admissions; Sumpter v. United States; May v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland; Tansimore v. United States; Berry v. Clemmer, Corrections Director; Vogelstein, trading as Baltimore Poster Co., v. National Screen Service Corp. et al.; DiSilvestro v. Clark et al., Judges; Stebbins v. Macy, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission, et al.; Montes v. Heritage, Warden; Lee v. Pate, Warden, et al.; Harper v. California; Holt v. Wisconsin; Clemons v. United States, 1963 — 375 U.S. 873 · caselaw · US