Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Canandaigua Water Works Company, Appellant, v. Village of Canandaigua et al., Respondents, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 619 · caselaw · US
General
The Canandaigua Water Works Company, Appellant, v. Village of Canandaigua et al., Respondents
149 N.Y. 619·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Canandaigua Water Works Company, Appellant, v. Village of Canandaigua et al., Respondents.
Memorandum of decision below, 90 Hun, 605.
(Argued June 8, 1896;
decided June 19, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made October 1, 1895, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction penclente lite.
Howard Mansfield for appellant
James C. Smith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order is not reviewable in this court, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.