Contracts · MBE-tested
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., et al.
444 U.S. 961·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 79-97.
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 824.] Motion of the State of California for divided argument granted.
Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.