Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Line Material Co. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, 1945 — 325 U.S. 834 · caselaw · US
IP
Line Material Co. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents
325 U.S. 834·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 665.
Line Material Co. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents.
May 7, 1945.
Messrs. Charles F. Meroni, Carlton Hill, William A. Smith, Jr. and Donald A. Gardiner for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy and Assistant Attorney General Shea for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed on the authority of Hoover Co. v. Coe, ante, p. 79, and the cause is remanded to the said Court of Appeals for further proceedings.