Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GROCERY DRIVERS UNION LOCAL 848 et al. v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING CO. OF LOS ANGELES, INC., 1959 — 359 U.S. 434 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
GROCERY DRIVERS UNION LOCAL 848 et al. v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING CO. OF LOS ANGELES, INC.
359 U.S. 434·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GROCERY DRIVERS UNION LOCAL 848 et al. v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING CO. OF LOS ANGELES, INC.
No. 169.
Decided May 4, 1959.
John C. Stevenson, Clarence E. Todd and Herbert M. Ansell for appellants.
Thomas P. Menzies and Carl M. Gould for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as' a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause remanded for modification in light of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.