Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
INDUSTRIAL OIL & GAS CO. et al., Appellants, v. HARDING GLASS CO. et al., Appellees, 1926 — 17 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
INDUSTRIAL OIL & GAS CO. et al., Appellants, v. HARDING GLASS CO. et al., Appellees
17 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
INDUSTRIAL OIL & GAS CO. et al., Appellants, v. HARDING GLASS CO. et al., Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
September 13, 1926.)
No. 7556.
Appeal from the District Court of the-United States for the Western District of Arkansas.
Daily & Woods, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for appellants.
Joseph R. Brown and James B. McDonough, both of Ft. Smith, Ark., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on motion of appellant and consent of appellees.