Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ralph Moss, Individually and as Surviving Executor of Solomon D. Moss, Deceased, Appellant, v. Jacob Cohen and Solomon D. Cohen as Administrator of Fanny Cohen, Deceased, Respondents, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 542 · caselaw · US
General
Ralph Moss, Individually and as Surviving Executor of Solomon D. Moss, Deceased, Appellant, v. Jacob Cohen and Solomon D. Cohen as Administrator of Fanny Cohen, Deceased, Respondents
159 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ralph Moss, Individually and as Surviving Executor of Solomon D. Moss, Deceased, Appellant, v. Jacob Cohen and Solomon D. Cohen as Administrator of Fanny Cohen, Deceased, Respondents.
(Submitted May 8, 1899;
decided May 12, 1899.)
Motion to request the Supreme Court to return remittitur and order that plaintiff show cause why it should not be amended, denied, without costs, and without prejudice to the right to renew the motion upon notice. (See 158 N. Y. 240.)