Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Local Lodge No. 926, et al. v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad et al.; and Farmers Grain Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Local Lodge No. 926, et al., 1947 — 332 U.S. 748 · caselaw · US
General
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Local Lodge No. 926, et al. v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad et al.; and Farmers Grain Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Local Lodge No. 926, et al.
332 U.S. 748·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 13, 1947.
Per Curiam Decisions.
No. 21.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Local Lodge No. 926, et al. v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad et al.; and Farmers Grain Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, Local Lodge No. 926, et al.
No. 42.
Louis F. Knoblock, Harold C. Heiss and Russell B. Day for petitioners in No. 21.
John E. Cassidy for the Farmers Grain Co. et al., petitioners in No. 42 and respondents in No. 21.
Guy A. Gladson, George W. Ott and Donald A. Morgan for the Toledo, P. & W. R. Co., respondent in Nos. 21 and 42.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated and the cases are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot, on motion of the respondent, Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad, it appearing that counsel for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al. agree that the cause is moot.