Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WHEATON COLLEGE, Applicant, v. Sylvia BURWELL, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 2898 · caselaw · US
General
WHEATON COLLEGE, Applicant, v. Sylvia BURWELL, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
134 S. Ct. 2898189 L. Ed. 2d 830·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Justice BREYER and Justice SOTOMAYOR dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WHEATON COLLEGE, Applicant,
v.
Sylvia BURWELL, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
No. 13A1284.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 30, 2014.
Case below, 2014 WL 226336.
Application for an injunction pending appellate review having been submitted to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court, the Court orders: Respondents are temporarily enjoined from enforcing against applicants the contraceptive coverage requirements imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4), and related regulations, pending the receipt of a response and reply and further order of the Court. The response to the application is due Wednesday, July 2, 2014, by 10 a.m. The reply is due Wednesday, July 2, 2014, by 5 p.m.
Justice BREYER and Justice SOTOMAYOR dissent.