General
Joseph R. Moore et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of New Jersey
223 U.S. 709·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 14.
Joseph R. Moore et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of New Jersey.
In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.
Argued for the plaintiff in error and submitted for the defendant in error October 26, 1911.
Decided October 30, 1911.
Mr. Thomas P. Fay for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edmund Wilson for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 100; David Kaufman & Sons Company v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Simon v. Craft, 182 U. S. 427; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 111; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 123.