Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Reuben H. Underhill, as Receiver of New York and Boston Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Patrick Keirns, Appellant, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Reuben H. Underhill, as Receiver of New York and Boston Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Patrick Keirns, Appellant
170 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Reuben H. Underhill, as Receiver of New York and Boston Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Patrick Keirns, Appellant.
Underhill v. Keirns, 54 App. Div. 814, affirmed.
(Argued February 25, 1902;
decided March 25, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 16, 1900, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on tidal at Special Term and granting a new trial.
Cha/rles C. Sanders and John Vincent for appellant.
Reuben II. Underhill and Henry B. Hathaway for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for the plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.