Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sweetenham et al. v. Gilligan, Governor of Ohio, et al., 1972 — 409 U.S. 942 · caselaw · US
General
Sweetenham et al. v. Gilligan, Governor of Ohio, et al.
409 U.S. 942·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 24, 1972
No. 70-15.
Sweetenham et al. v. Gilligan, Governor of Ohio, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. S. D. Ohio.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.