Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William C. SHANLEY, Jr., Mary Regis Shanley and Bernard M. Stanley, 2d, as Executors of the Estate of William C. Shanley, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee, 1928 — 28 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Tax
William C. SHANLEY, Jr., Mary Regis Shanley and Bernard M. Stanley, 2d, as Executors of the Estate of William C. Shanley, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee
28 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William C. SHANLEY, Jr., Mary Regis Shanley and Bernard M. Stanley, 2d, as Executors of the Estate of William C. Shanley, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 15, 1928.
No. 4.
Douglas, Armitage & McCann, of New York City (Paul Armitage, Edward Hollo-
way, and William C. Shanley, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Morton P. Fisher, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., C. M. Charest, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Shelby S. Faulkner, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order of the Board of Tax Appeals affirmed, on the authority of Union Pacific R. Co. v. Bowers, etc. (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 788, certiorari denied October 8, 1928.