Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edmund J. A. WILLIAMS, as Trustee In Bankruptcy of HANFREDENE REALTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor to Bowery and East River National Bank, Defendant-Appellant, 1931 — 54 F.2d 487 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Edmund J. A. WILLIAMS, as Trustee In Bankruptcy of HANFREDENE REALTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor to Bowery and East River National Bank, Defendant-Appellant
54 F.2d 487·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edmund J. A. WILLIAMS, as Trustee In Bankruptcy of HANFREDENE REALTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor to Bowery and East River National Bank, Defendant-Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1931.
Curtin & Glynn, of New York City, for appellant.
Leo. J. Linder and Morris Permut, both of New York City, for appellee.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — MANTON, Circuit Judge.]
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit in equity by the trustee to recover a preference under section 67e of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 107 (e). The bill is in equity, and alleges the transfer to have been voidable, having been made within four months prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. A motion is made to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not taken within 30 days, the time prescribed by section 24c of the Bankruptcy Aet (11 USCA § 47 (e). It was taken within 90 days after the deeree was entered. For the reasons which we have stated in Lowenstein v. Reikes, 54 F.(2d) 481, decided this day, the motion herein is denied.
Motion denied.