Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michael Sheehan, Respondent, v. Xaver Mayer, Appellant, 1892 — 129 N.Y. 675 · caselaw · US
General
Michael Sheehan, Respondent, v. Xaver Mayer, Appellant
129 N.Y. 675·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Sheehan, Respondent, v. Xaver Mayer, Appellant.
(Submitted December 21, 1891;
decided January 20, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 22, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Willimi H Henderson for appellant.
Ansley do Yreeland for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur.
■Judgment affirmed.