General
Mary Hennessy, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant
147 N.Y. 721·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Hennessy, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 73 Hun, 569.
(Argued November 1, 1895;
decided November 26, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 1, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plain tiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Matthew Male for appellant.
James O. Church for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray and Haight, JJ., not sitting.