Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland State Board of Censors, 1970 — 397 U.S. 984 · caselaw · US
General
Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland State Board of Censors
397 U.S. 984·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 905.
Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland State Board of Censors.
Edward de Grasia, Nathan Lewin, Arnold M. Weiner, and Alan M. Dershowitz for appellants. Francis B. Burch, Attorney General of Maryland, and Thomas N. Biddison, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Thomas R. Asher and Melvin L. Wulf for American Civil Liberties Union et al. as amici curiae in support of appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Ct. App. Md. Probable jurisdiction noted.