Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John J. Reeber et al., Appellants, v. Charles H. Meyer, Respondent, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
General
John J. Reeber et al., Appellants, v. Charles H. Meyer, Respondent
155 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John J. Reeber et al., Appellants, v. Charles H. Meyer, Respondent.
Heeler v. Meyer, 21 App. Div. 638, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted February 28, 1898;
decided March 15, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 20, 1897, affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion to compel defendant’s attorney to accept a notice of appeal from a judgment.
James T. McMahon for appellants.
II. H. Glass for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.